Social media transforms journalism

Community. Connection. Information.

These are the characterizing words of a society that now relies on the revolutionary realm of social media. It’s a growing phenomenon that is not only transforming the life of the individual, but—as stated in an article by Eugenia Siapera of the Institute for Future Media and Journalism—it has caused the world of journalism to undergo a significant metamorphosis as well.

What happens when news content shifts its focus from traditional media and enters the social networking domain? Information becomes available to all and by all, and—according to Siapera—it distributes the role of the journalist to the average citizen.

“Gone are the days of the lone muckraking reporter,” wrote Siapera. “Readers are now an integral part of journalism.”

In this ultra-connected cyber world, everybody becomes an active participant in the publication and diffusion of current events.

But if news is now more plentiful and accessible, then what’s the problem?

Aidan White, British journalist and director of the Coalition for Ethical Journalism, believes that journalistic material follows a stricter set of standards than the general content on social networks.

“Journalists are bound by rules and ethics,” said White. “Unlike social media, journalists are required to give information in a responsible way.”

In the example of the Boston Bombing, stories began circulating so rapidly that there was hardly enough time to separate the false accounts from the valid ones. Imprudent speculation through social media caused people to pursue the wrong suspect. The faulty investigation eventually led officials to the dead body of a young man with no link to the marathon tragedy whatsoever.

This event clearly demonstrates how the filters of truth and accuracy—those that give traditional news platforms their heightened level of credibility—were completely stripped away through social media.

One writer for the Huffington Post, Jayson DeMers, described the miscommunication as an “important and extremely tragic learning experience—[one that displays society’s] inevitable movement to a decentralized information sharing system.”

So what can one conclude about the role of social media in journalism? Is it good? Bad? Dangerous? Perhaps to embrace this high-speed, interconnected era of reporting is merely to wield a powerful—yet problematic—double-edged sword.

Nicole Lanzer

This entry was posted in Journalism, Social Media and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Social media transforms journalism

  1. Al Gentile says:

    I believe White is correct here. What has changed is the mode in which journalists become informed, and I would argue it makes our jobs in ways more difficult because of the morass of useless information that can be reported on in any particular event.

    Yet, now the world has many more eyes on wrong-doers (and celebrities, and rumors for better or worse). It truly becomes harder to do wrong in this world without anybody knowing about it.

    What stands true is this: these developments can generate a net positive effect if journalists stuck to their guns and responsibly report the news. Hold steadfast to their ethics, and in many cases work harder than they did before.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s